&
Advertise Here with Today.com
 

Jul 30 2008

Friday the 13th again?

Published by carl8447 at 8:42 pm under Uncategorized Edit This

I’ve seen the trailer of a yet another useless remake. The upcoming rehasing of Friday the 13th. The above clip is a scene from the set of the film. The trailer isn’t out yet for public access. This is confusing because the character of Jason Vorhees wasn’t the focus of the original 1980 film, in other words, the film was actually a mystery. The trailer of the film shows a hulking, athletic Jason Vorhees(hockey mask) an all running after people. My only guess is that this version of the film is actually an update of all the films(or a remake of ALL the films). My comment about the trailer is that from what I saw(I might actually give this a chance, for a second)it looks like nothing orginal. It looks like its going to be another TEXAS CHAINSAW remake, where they’re going to up the blood and lower the scares. My only question to the producer of the Friday the 13th update is the following: What are you going to do to make the action and the scenes in the film original? The Friday the 13th series had ten sequels(Not counting the spin-off Freddy vs. Jason), what hasn’t been done, what weapon hasn’t Jason used to dispatch some horny teenagers. The film comes out in October of 2008, and we’ll see if updating this time works for the better or worse.   

Share and Enjoy:
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google
Possibly-related Articles:                                        (auto-generated)
Advertise Here with Today.com

One Response to “Friday the 13th again?”

  1. techspotlighton 30 Jul 2008 at 9:27 pm edit this

    Wow, I hadnt heard of this and I cant wait. I am a total fan of Jason! Thanks for the info, I will be waiting! Check out my Tech Blog if interested. wwww.techspotlight.today.com

Trackback URI | Comments RSS

Leave a Reply

Advertise Here
Some Today.com contributors may have received a fee or a promotional product or service from a manufacturer for promotional consideration, while others receive no consideration at all. Each contributor is responsible for disclosing any such promotional consideration.